

The project team on the SAN tests (from
top to bottom):
Dipl.-Ing. Horst Köhler
(Group Leader IT System Planning, IT Platform Intelligent
Storage at DeTeCSM Darmstadt),
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Dirk Kabelitz
(Group Leader Client/Server System Management at DeTeCSM Magdeburg),
Ronald Löbig
(Systems Engineer with COMPAREX).
Is SAN A Viable Option for Data Centres?
As volumes of data continue to grow, data centre operations
need Fibre Channel technology more than ever to manage their
data flow efficiently. The heterogeneity of today's IT urgently
requires a SAN solution. Many vendors have their individual
solutions, but vendor-independent system integration labs
are still a rarity - reason enough for Deutsche Telekom subsidiary
DeTeCSM (Computer Service Management GmbH) to create a complex
test scenario at its own location in Magdeburg to achieve
"meaningful results for the further implementation of SANs
in its data centres".
Test Scenario: Spotlight on Connectivity
and Performance
DeTeCSM selected COMPAREX to provide the support and consultancy
required to conduct its extensive tests, carried out between
October 1999 and January 2000, because of COMPAREX`s comprehensive
expertise in the area of enterprise storage in general and
its success in implementing SAN solutions in particular. The
tests used the configuration already existing at DeTeCSM installed
by COMPAREX (with the exception of the HPUX servers). The
aim was not only to test the performance of individual components
against each other, but also to test the overall system within
the framework of a comprehensive Storage Area Network. The
IT environment listed below provided the basis for testing:
- Operating systems: Windows NT 4.0, SUN SOLARIS 2.6, HP-UX
11.0, (AIX was considered as a further theoretical component)
- Hardware (servers): Siemens, Compaq, SUN, HP
- Hardware (SAN components): COMPAREX, FC Switch ED5000
(McData), HP-FC-Switch F16 (Brocade with HP firmware), COMPAREX-FC-SCSI
bridge CB 1200
- Hardware (disk subsystems): COMPAREX TETRAGON 2100, EMC
3930.
The test used standard benchmarking software. Particular
emphasis was placed on analysing the difference in performance
between existing point-to-point solutions and the new switched
topology.
Results
DeTeCSM anticipated a considerable downgrade in performance
after moving to a switched topology. However, Dirk Kabelitz
had this to say about the test results: "After moving to a
switched fabric SAN, the performance losses resulting from
connecting to a switch are only around 1% compared with our
existing point-to-point connections. These are absolutely
superb results!."
Test Scenarios:
- Direct connection of server to disk subsystem via Fibre
Channel using an Arbitrated Loop Protocol
- Connection of server to disk subsystem via Fibre Channel
switch (Fabric Protocol)
- Connection of server to disk subsystem via Fibre Channel
switch with two FC connections and with load balancing software
- Connection of a cluster (without SUN) to disk subsystem
via Fibre Channel switch with two FC connections (high availability
tests)
- Dedicated assignment of LUNs for the various operating
systems (heterogeneity tests)
- Zoning via FC switch with simultaneous connections to
two disk subsystems (COMPAREX, EMC)
- A maximum bandwidth per server port of 70 to 85 MB/s was
measured in read-only mode and 15 to 20 MB/s in read/write
mode (70:30 ratio)
The individual tests in the above scenarios produced extremely
positive results.
Conclusions: SAN Works Well!
"What we have seen", states Dirk Kabelitz, "is that Storage
Area Networks function perfectly at a physical level and that
integration into operating systems has already been implemented,
at least in part (HP-UX runs in Arbitrated Loop mode only).
However, there are still some problems to overcome as some
manufacturers are still struggling with drivers. Having said
that, they are in the process of designing and implementing
solutions which will soon be available." Comprehensive SAN
management, however, is currently still in its infancy.
Assessment: SAN Implementation to Progress
Rapidly
"In conclusion," sums up Dirk Kabelitz, "we can say that
Storage Area Networking is a fast developing technology. First
products are now on the market and the manufacturers have
started to unite to work towards creating uniform standards,
enabling those solutions the customer needs to be implemented."
SANs (in FC-AL mode) have already been implemented within
the organisation. DeTeCSM has implemented them to replace
backups across the network and to consolidate storage. COMPAREX
has demonstrated that it is a competent and ideal partner
for the future as far as enterprise-wide Storage Area Networking
is concerned. Says Dirk Kabelitz: "As a result of our tests
we will now certainly continue to extend our Storage Area
Network". And equally important, SAN provides for independent
storage management and can easily absorb annual data growth
rates of 100%. Further tests on load balancing, SAN management
and switch cascading are planned.